Celebrating Our Reviewers

Our reviewers

THE QUALITY of a scholarly journal rests upon the knowledge and dedication of its referees. During the past two years, the Associate Editors (Toby Berger, Jack Capon, John G. Proakis, Luther D. Rudolph, Donald L. Snyder, and Terry J. Wagner) and I, all new to our positions, have been deeply impressed by both the competence and the generosity of the referees for this TRANSACTIONS. Their contribu...

Thanks to Our Peer-Reviewers in 2016

Thanking our peer reviewers

At the beginning of each year, BiO takes the opportunity to thank its many reviewers for their contribution to the journal. The peer review process is the cornerstone of research publication in the biological sciences. As a publishing company, we are very aware that this vital component of the publication process is done, for free, by scientists worldwide. Whilewe can assist our reviewers in ev...

Our 2005 Reviewers

T he articles in IEEE Software are the result of many people’s hard work. We deeply appreciate the efforts of everyone who participated in our peer review process from 17 Nov. 2004 to 31 Dec. 2005. Authors often tell us how much they value reviewers’ comments and suggestions. Their expertise, care, and attention help maintain Software’s quality. If you’d like to contribute to our community by r...

Celebrating our 20th digital anniversary.

In 1997, 6 years after the World Wide Web became accessible to the public, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences launched its website, heralding our entry into the Internet age and the expeditious dissemination of our scientific content worldwide (see Infographic). Toward the end of the last millennium, we redesigned the website to improve user experience and rebranded the journal...